TABLE OF CONTENTS
stephanie.tencer@utoronto.ca

METHODOLOGY

AREA LICENSING SCHEME - SINGAPORE

OVERVIEW
EFFECT ON ROAD USE
EFFECT ON EMISSIONS
POLITICAL SUPPORT OR RESISTANCE
COST
REVENUE
TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION
MISCELLANEOUS
SUMMARY

VARIABLE-TOLL EXPRESS LANE FACILITY - ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

OVERVIEW
COSTS
EFFECT ON ROAD USE
POLITICAL SUPPORT OR RESISTANCE
TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION
SUMMARY
FUTURE RESEARCH

WORKS CITED

BIBLIOGRAPHY

APPENDIX 1 - EMISSIONS BEFORE AND AFTER IMPLEMENTING THE ALS 18

Methodology

In order to conduct a thorough case study analysis, we have identified 6 criteria with which we will evaluate relevant case studies.  The following table lists the 6 criteria and the issues to be addressed under each of the criteria.

Table 1: Evaluation Criteria for Case Study Analysis
 
Criteria Issues                To Be Addressed 
Effect on Road Use 
  • Effect on congestion. 
  • Effect on modal split. 
  • Number of users. 
   
Effect on Emissions 
  • Effect on air quality with an emphasis on greenhouse emissions. 
Political Support  
or Resistance 
  • Income group equity - effect on different income group brackets. 
  • Gender/Age equity - effect on different sexes and age brackets. 
  • Geographic equity - locational effects. 
  • Public acceptance. 
Cost 
  • Capital costs. 
  • Operating costs. 
  • Revenues generated.
Revenue
  • How revenues from the program are spent. 
  • The success of the programs towards which the generated revenue is spent. 
Technical Implementation
  • Technology compatibility. 
  • Enforcement. 
  • Privacy. 
  • Price determination. 
 

At this stage of our research, we are compiling information for our analysis by organizing the material according to the defined evaluation criteria.   For our April report, we intend to have additional case study material as well as an analysis of the material.  The analysis will entail the strengths and weaknesses of the various case studies in the context of what potentially, would work best for the City of Toronto.

Included in this report is the data collected to date pertaining to Singapore’s Area Licensing Scheme and Orange County, California’s Variable-Toll Express Lane Facility.  Following the data is a brief summary of each case study and a list of future research plans.
 
Area Licensing Scheme - Singapore

OVERVIEW

Singapore is an island with a total land area of 648 square kilometres and in 1991, had a population of 3.4 million (Phang & Toh, 1997:97).  More than three quarters of the population lives in self contained towns that are connected via a network of highways (Menon et al, 1993:44).  Since the early 1960’s, Singapore’s economy has grown, on average, 8 per cent per year.  Singapore’s per capita gross national product in 1995 was S$34,500 or approximately US$24,500 (S$1 = US$0.71) (Phang & Toh, 1997:97).

The manually operated, cordon road pricing system implemented in Singapore, the Area Licensing Scheme (ALS), was the first of its kind.  It was implemented within the Central Business District (CBD) in June of 1975.  The original purpose of the program was to discourage commuters from relying on automobiles.  Since then, the program’s objective has been revised.  As of June 1989, the purpose of the ALS is to serve as a traffic management tool to curtail congestion (Menon et al, 1993:44).

Table 2: The Original ALS (1975-1989) and the Revised ALS (1989-Present) (Menon et al, 1993:45)
 
 Original ALS  Revised ALS 
Objective Manage the widespread use of private cars  Congestion pricing 
Restricted Zone (Area)  610 ha in 1975; increased to 710 ha after 1986v  725 ha 
Restricted Hours 7:30 - 10:15 a.m. 7:30 - 10:15 a.m.  
4:30 - 6:30 p.m
Restricted Vehicles Private car, company car and taxi Private car, company car, taxi, goods vehicle, non-scheduled bus and motorcycle 
Daily ALS Fees S$2 for taxi; S$5 for private car; and S$10 for company car, that is, cars owned by companies for business purposes  S$3 for car, taxi, goods vehicle and non-scheduled bus; S$1 for motorcycle; and S$6 for company car 
 
There are four components to Singapore’s ALS (Menon et al, 1993:44):

EFFECT ON ROAD USE

 Effect on Congestion:

Table 3: Inbound Traffic Volumes for May 1993 and May 1994 (adapted from Phang & Toh, 1997:100)
 
 
 May 1993
 May 1994
 Change 
7:00 am to 7:30 am
 8442
  8,363 
 -79 
7:30 am to 8:00 am
  5393
 6,960 
+1567 
8:00 am to 9:45 am
  34,475
 43,340 
 -7865 
9:45 am to 10:15 am
  7917 
9,909 
+1992 
10:15 am to 10:45 am
  14,561
 11,180 
-3381 
4:00 pm to 4:30 pm
  12,842
 10,746
 -2076 
4:30 pm to 5:00 am 
6,796
 8,646
 +1850 
5:00 am to 6:00 am
  14,361
 17,292 
+2931 
6:00 am to 6:30 am
  7,222
 8,043 
+821 
6:30 am to 7:00 am
  13,749
 13,207
 -502 
 
Effect on Modal Split EFFECT ON EMISSIONS  POLITICAL SUPPORT OR RESISTANCE Public Acceptance: COST REVENUE TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION MISCELLANEOUS SUMMARY

The ALS was successful in decreasing congestion, perhaps even too much as it exceeded its goal of reducing traffic volumes by 15 per cent.  The ALS significantly decreased the number of cars entering the restricted zone and the use of transit services increased.  Both transit users and automobile drivers experienced reductions in travel time.  The ALS did not have negative impacts on businesses or employment levels within the area, but traffic on surrounding roads increased.  There was no severe public opposition to the Scheme and the public experienced noticeable benefits.  Although the direct impacts of the ALS on emissions are difficult to isolate, air quality has generally improved since the implementation of the ALS.  The Singapore experience suggests that it is very useful to invest revenues in carpooling infrastructure, as carpooling gained significant popularity after the implementation of the ALS.  There were no major technical hurdles in implementing or operating the ALS, but it is extremely labour intensive to operate.  All in all, the ALS has been successful in achieving its goals.
 



 

Variable-Toll Express Lane Facility - Orange County, California

OVERVIEW

The State Route 91 (SR 91) Variable-Toll Express Lanes, located in Orange County, California, is the first fully automated, privately owned, toll road in the world (I).  The four-lane toll facility began operating on December 27, 1995.  The 10 mile long toll lanes were built adjacent to a public freeway.  The primary goal of the program is to manage congestion in the area.  The average one way trip time for SR 91 commuters is over an hour (Applied Research...II:4).  Toll rates vary by time of day, depending on the traffic of the adjacent freeway.  The tolls range from US$0.25 at night to US$2.50 in the peak hours.  Vehicles with three or more occupants ride free.

COSTS

EFFECT ON ROAD USE

Effect on Congestion:

Effect on Modal Split: Number of Users: POLITICAL SUPPORT OR RESISTANCE

Income Equity:

Gender/Age Equity: Geographic Equity: Public Acceptance: TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION  SUMMARY

People are using the SR 91 toll lanes and the numbers are expected to continue increasing.  Despite the increase in the number of vehicles on SR 91, transit usage was not negatively impacted by the toll routes.  Both the number of HOVs and SOVs increased.  The overall effect however, was a decline in average vehicle occupancy.  The SR 91 toll lanes have been successful in decreasing congestion along SR 91 and do not appear to have had any negative impacts on local traffic or businesses.  Higher income travelers are most likely to use the toll roads and the youngest and oldest travelers are least likely to travel the toll routes.  There has been no major opposition to the toll routes and support is continuing to rise.  To date, there is very little information regarding the cost of the program and no information regarding the impact of the program on air quality and how the generated revenues are spent.



 
 

Future Research 

 
 Type of Project
 Description
   Location 
Variable Tolls on an Existing Toll Road or Bridge  Increase the peak-hour toll for commuters, depending on demand, and possible lower the off peak toll.
  • San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge in California 
  • Tappan Zee Bridge in New York City 
  • Bridges in Fort Meyers in Florida 
 
 

Incentive Pricing 
on HOV lanes 

Allow lower-occupant vehicles to pay a fee to travel on existing, underutilized HOV lanes. 
  •  I-15 in San Diego, California 
  • Katy Freeway in Houston, Texas 

Variables Fees on Congested Roads, 
Parking Pricing & off-peak Differentials 

Apply congestion relief tolls on existing heavily congested road(s).  

  • Minneapolis - St. Paul, Minnesota 
  •  Boulder, Colorado 
  •  Los Angeles, California 
  •  Portland, Oregon 
 

From these nine pilot projects, only two (Orange County and Minneapolis) are in their implementation phase.  Many of the others however, have conducted feasibility studies.   Obtaining these studies is an obvious next step in conducting our case study analysis.

 
Type of Project
   Description
  Location
Increase Parking Fees  Use revenue to pay for new and/or improved transit service(s).
  • University of Washington, Seattle 
 

Discounting Parking Rates at 
Parking Garages 

Use parking discounts to provide and economic incentive for carpooling. 
  • I-394 in Minneapolis, Minnesota 

Parking Cash-Out Programs

 Employers allow employees to cash out parking reimbursements and use the money according to each person’s preference.

  •  Los Angeles, California 

 


 Works Cited

1. Applied Research & Development Facilities & Activities, California Polytechnic State University Foundation. “Information on the SR91 Toll Lanes”. www.ardfa.calpoly.edu/~jwhanson/sr91info/sr91info.html.
 
2. Applied Research & Development Facilities & Activities, California Polytechnic State University Foundation II. 1998.  “Evaluating the Impacts of the SR 91 Variable-Toll Express Lane Facility, Final Report”. http://ceenve.calpoly.edu/sullivan/sr91/sr91.htm.
 
3. Chin, A. T. H. 1996. “Containing Air Pollution and Traffic Congestion: Transport Policy and the Environment in Singapore”. In Atmospheric Environment. Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 787 - 801.
 
4. Hattum, D. V. and M. Zimmerman. 1996. Buying Time: Guidebook, A Guidebook for Those Considering Congestion Relief Tolls in Their Communities. www.hhh.umn.edu/Centers/SLP/Conpric/guidebk.htm.
 
5. Menon A. P. et al, 1993. “Singapore’s Road Pricing System: Its Past, Present and Future”.  In ITE Journal. Vol. 63, No. 12. pp. 44 - 48.
 
6. Phang S. Y. & R. Toh, 1997.  “From Manual to Electronic Road Congestion Pricing: The Singapore Experience and Experiment”. In Transportation Research. Vol. 33, No. 2. pp. 97 - 106.
  



Bibliography

1. Applied Research & Development Facilities & Activities, California Polytechnic State University Foundation. “Information on the SR91 Toll Lanes”. www.ardfa.calpoly.edu/~jwhanson/sr91info/sr91info.html.
 
2. Applied Research & Development Facilities & Activities, California Polytechnic State University Foundation II. 1998.  “Evaluating the Impacts of the SR 91 Variable-Toll Express Lane Facility, Final Report”. http://ceenve.calpoly.edu/sullivan/sr91/sr91.htm.
 
3. Arrillaga, B. 1993. “U.S. Experience with Congestion Pricing”. In ITE Journal. Vol. 63, No. 12, pp..39 - 43.
 
4. Atash, F. 1996. “Reorienting Metropolitan Land Use and Transportation Policies in the USA”. In Land Use Policy. Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 37 - 49.
 
5. Bhatt, K. 1993. “Implementing Congestion Pricing: Winners and Losers”. In ITE Journal. Vol. 63, No. 12, pp. 33 - 37.
 
6. Chin, A. T. H. 1996. “Containing Air Pollution and Traffic Congestion: Transport Policy and the Environment in Singapore”. In Atmospheric Environment. Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 787 - 801.
 
7. Cloke, J. and R. E. Layfield. 1996. “The Environmental Impact of Traffic Management Schemes”. In Urban Transport & the Environment II.
 
8. Decorla-Souza, P. 1993. “Congestion Pricing: Issues and Opportunities”. In ITE Journal. Vol. 63, No. 12, pp. 27 - 32.
 
9. Environmental Defence Fund. 1996. EDF Letter. Vol. XXVII, No. 6.
 
10. Hattum, D. V. and M. Zimmerman. 1996. Buying Time: Guidebook, A Guidebook for Those Considering Congestion Relief Tolls in Their Communities. www.hhh.umn.edu/Centers/SLP/Conpric/guidebk.htm.
 
11. Helali, K. and B. G. Hutchinson. 1995. “The Potential Effects of Road Pricing on Air Quality in the Toronto Area”. In Urban Transport & the Environment II.
 
12. Johansen, F. 1989. “Toll Road Characteristics and Toll Road Experience in Selected South East Asia Countries”. In Transportation Research. Vol. 23A, No. 6, pp. 463 - 466.
 
13. Lampe, A. J. 1993. “Effects of Road Access Pricing at the Los Angeles Airport: A Case Study”. In ITE Journal. Vol. 63, No. 12, pp. 22 - 24.
 
14. Langmyhr, T. 1997. “Managing Equity: The Case of Road Pricing”. In Transport Policy. Vol. 4. No. 1. pp 25 - 39.
 
15. Lave, C. 1994. “The Demand Curve Under Road Pricing and The Problem of Political Feasibility”. In Transportation Research. Vol. 28A, No. 2, pp. 83 - 91.
 
16. May, A. 1993. “International Experiences with Congestion Pricing”. In ITE Journal. Vol. 63, No. 12, pp. 14 - 20.
 
17. McCarthy, P. S. 1996. “The Effect of Congestion Pricing on Metropolitan Demands for Fuel Efficient Vehicles”. In Urban Transport and the Environment II.
 
18. Menon A. P. et al, 1993. “Singapore’s Road Pricing System: Its Past, Present and Future”.  In ITE Journal. Vol. 63, No. 12. pp. 44 - 48.
 
19. Minnesota Department of Transportation and Mn/DOT Office of Alternative Transportation Financing. Minnesota Congestion Pricing Study. www.hhh.umn.edu/Centers/SLP/Conpric/mndot.htm.
 
20. Munnich, L. W. et al. 1995. Institutional and Political Issues in Congestion Pricing: New Models for Federal, State and Local Cooperation in Infrastructure Investment.  University of Minnesota, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs: pp. 2 - 20.
 
21. Odani, M & N. Akita. 1996. “Public Attitudes Towards the Introduction of Road Pricing in the Central Business District”. In Urban Transport & the Environment II.
 
22. Phang S. Y. & R. Toh, 1997.  “From Manual to Electronic Road Congestion Pricing: The Singapore Experience and Experiment”. In Transportation Research. Vol. 33, No. 2. pp. 97 - 106.
 
23. Stough, R. R. & P. Rietveld, 1997. “Institutional Issues in Transport Systems”. In Journal of Transport Geography. Vol. 5, No. 3. Pp. 207 - 214.
 
24. Transportation Action Network. 1996. Progress. www.transact.org/nov96/sr91.htm.
 
25. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration and Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs. 1996. Regional Congestion Pricing Workshop: Proceedings. www.hhh.umn.edu/Centers/SLP/Conpric/chicago.htm.
 
 
 


Appendix 1 - Emissions Before and After Implementing the ALS